Once the entry period has finished, the JCs carry out their initial legality checks. This is to ensure that all entries conform to the rules of the competition. It is worth noting that if an entry is disqualified due to breaking the rules, the entry fee for the Student Radio Awards is still applicable (there is no entry fee for the Amplify Awards). The main elements that are checked here is that there is no duplication amongst entries, no attempts to circumvent the word count, no links included where links are not permitted, and that the audio has not gone over the time limit. After the checks, the judging can begin.

Each judge is assigned a category – ideally one that they identify as confident in judging. Once assigned a category, the judges will be assigned their entries. The assignment of entries is done entirely by random; judges can highlight if any conflict of interest comes up, but will still score the entry – the JCs will review any conflicts to determine if the score is fair and allowed to stand. There are limits to the number of entries a judge can see, but no limit to the number of times an entry can be seen. Each entry will be viewed by a minimum of two judges, but the aim is to have as many eyes on each entry as possible.

The judges score each entry on five criteria. These are not publicly shared and remain confidential, to help ensure the competition remains fair. However, the criteria are all taken from the descriptions of the categories as shown on the award platform, so the information is available if not explicitly stated. Each category has different criteria, and each criterium is scored out of ten. There is an additional element that is the same for all categories, which is an Entry Strength score given out of three. This is for the judges discretion to use when an entry may not necessarily do well on the criteria but is worthy of a higher mark, or to emphasise a really good entry. As a result, each judge will end up giving a score out of 53.

The scores from all of the judges of a particular entry are then averaged, and the results are made based on this average score. In the event of tiebreaks, the first port of call is that the JCs will take the Entry Strength score out of the tied entries, giving the higher placing to whichever has met the criteria the better. If this does not separate the scores, then individual scores from judges are considered. If the same judge has viewed both, then their high score comes out on top; if not, the highest scores for each entry are considered. If the scores are still tied, both will be reviewed by the Head Judge (normally, but not always, one of the JCs), and they will decide which will get the higher placing based on the criteria of the category.

For the Student Radio Awards, all judges will leave a comment on every entry that they read, to provide feedback which can be read following the Awards night (available from the following morning until the end of December). No feedback is left for the Amplify Awards.

The other comments that judges can leave are to nominate an entry for the Kevin Greening Award for Creativity at the Student Radio Awards or the Amplify Award at the Amplify Awards. There is no set criteria for these categories; rather, they are judged on an individual basis and ranked on their creativity/demonstration of student radio values. These categories are judged by the Judging Coordinators.

When the scores have been completed, the top 6 results are subjected to a second legality check, to double check compliance on the earlier elements as well as confirming that entries have been paid and that a membership is valid. These results are then passed onto the SRA team to organise the ceremonies.